What would Mr. Qinglin think?
Friday, January 30th, 2009Atlantic Canadians don’t usually think about political ideology. With the collapse of our old ideological foes the Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact our liberal democracy seems safe for the moment. However that does not mean we should take it for granted nor stop looking for ways to improve it. There is, in fact a new ideological foe; China, a new global power still dominated by one-party totalitarianism. China’s attitude towards our liberal democracy is clear. Recently Jia Qinglin, China’s fourth-most senior official, charged Communist Party members to strengthen their “ideological unity” and to support wholeheartedly the one-party state. “Build a line of defence to resist Western two-party and multiparty systems, bicameral legislature, the separation of powers and other kinds of erroneous ideological interferences,” Mr. Qinglin wrote in an essay published in the party’s main ideological journal, Qiushi (seek truth).
If there is such a thing as a rule of thumb in political analysis it is this; whatever ideologically driven totalitarian people or parties or states want should probably be resisted and anything they say is bad is probably a good thing.
So what would Mr. Qinglin say about us? Our multi-party system and federal bicameral system show “erroneous ideological interferences”. But then he would notice how ineffective the Senate is with all the power concentrated in Parliament. He would certainly approve of our lack of separation of powers and the concentration of almost all power into the hands of a few party leaders at the federal and provincial levels. This, he would say, ensures no “interferences” in governance, particularly from citizens.
Yes, Mr. Qinglin could be quite comfortable here.